The Silent Crisis: Addressing Behavioral Health Challenges Among Older Adults

As the older generation continues to age, the demographic landscape of the United States is shifting dramatically. As of 2024, there are currently approximately 62 million adults ages 65 and older living in the U.S., according to the research released by the Pew Research Center, leading to Older adults now making up over 18 percent of the population.  Recent studies predict that the U.S. Centenarian population is expected to quadruple over the next 30 years and with this growth comes a critical need to address their behavioral health concerns. The recent SAMHSA report, “Behavioral Health among Older Adults: Results from the 2021 and 2022 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health,” sheds light on the pressing issues of substance use and mental health in this age group, revealing a silent crisis that demands our attention.

Unveiling the Statistics

The SAMHSA report provides a comprehensive analysis of substance use and mental health issues among older adults. According to the report, approximately 12.5% of older adults had a mental illness in the past year, with serious mental illness affecting around 2%. Substance use disorders were prevalent in 9.1% of this population, with 5.6% experiencing alcohol use disorder and 4.1% facing drug use disorder.

  • About 1 in 25 older adults had a drug use disorder (DUD) in the past year.
  • Fewer than 1 in 3 older adults that were classified as needing substance use treatments actually received it.
  • Of the older adults that received substance use treatments, nearly all (97%) did not think they needed it.
  • 2.7 million older adults had a major depressive episode in the past year, with females being twice as likely to experience one over their male counterparts.
  • About 1 in 50 older adults had serious thoughts of suicide in the past year.

These statistics are alarming, yet they reflect only a portion of the problem. Older adult females are more likely to suffer from mental illness, while older adult males have higher rates of substance use disorders. This gender disparity underscores the need for tailored interventions that address the specific needs of men and women in this age group.

Barriers to Treatment

Despite the high prevalence of mental health and substance use disorders, treatment remains elusive for many older adults. The SAMHSA report highlights that fewer than one-third of older adults who needed substance use treatment received it in the past year. Similarly, only about 46% of those living with any mental illness received treatment.

Several factors contribute to this treatment gap. Medical conditions associated with aging, significant life changes, and social isolation can exacerbate mental health issues. Additionally, stigma, cost, transportation difficulties, and challenges navigating the healthcare system pose significant barriers to accessing care. As noted in the report, “Older adults who might benefit from treatment also typically did not perceive that they needed it.”

The Impact of Loneliness

Loneliness is a significant concern for older adults, as highlighted in both the SAMHSA report and a study by researchers at the Indiana University School of Medicine. The study found that loneliness is significantly associated with lower mental and physical quality of life among older adults. This finding aligns with the broader themes of the SAMHSA report, which emphasizes the adverse effects of social isolation on mental health.

The U.S. Surgeon General’s 2023 report on social connection further underscores the importance of addressing loneliness. It emphasizes the need for supportive connections, including friendships, community involvement, and the mental health benefits of connecting with pets. As we celebrated the first inauguration of Older Americans Month in May, this year’s theme, “Powered by Connection,” aptly highlights the multifaceted benefits of social interactions.

Gender Differences in Behavioral Health

The SAMHSA report and other studies consistently show gender differences in behavioral health among older adults. Women are more likely to experience mental health issues, while men have higher rates of substance use disorders. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing effective interventions.

In a comprehensive review by the University  of St. Augustine for Health Sciences (USAHS), it was noted that “33.5% of adults with a mental illness also reported a substance use disorder in 2021.” This statistic highlights the complex interplay between mental health and substance use, particularly among older adults. Addressing these co-occurring disorders requires a holistic approach that considers both mental and physical health.

The Role of Primary Care

Primary care clinicians play a pivotal role in addressing the behavioral health needs of older adults. As suggested by the Indiana University study, clinicians should actively discuss loneliness with their older patients and provide resources to help them develop and maintain meaningful social relationships. This proactive approach can help mitigate the adverse effects of loneliness and improve overall mental health.

Moving Forward

Addressing the behavioral health challenges among older adults requires a multifaceted approach that includes increasing awareness, reducing stigma, and improving access to care. Service providers must focus on:

  1. Education and Awareness: Educating older adults about the risks of substance use and the importance of mental health care is crucial. Reducing stigma around these issues can encourage more individuals to seek help.
  2. Improving Access: Addressing barriers such as cost, transportation, and healthcare navigation is essential to ensure that older adults receive the care they need.
  3. Targeted Interventions: Developing interventions tailored to high-risk groups, particularly older males for substance use disorders and older females for mental health issues, can help mitigate these problems effectively.
  4. Support for Caregivers: Providing resources and support for caregivers is vital, as they play a key role in the well-being of older adults.

As the population of older adults continues to grow, addressing their behavioral health needs becomes increasingly urgent. By understanding and addressing the challenges highlighted in the SAMHSA report and other studies, we can improve the quality of life for this vulnerable population and ensure they receive the care and support they deserve.


Combatting Food Insecurity: How Medically Tailored Meals Transform Lives of Older Adults

In a country where food insecurity remains a persistent issue, particularly among older adults, initiatives like Mom’s Meals’ recent donation of 30,000 medically tailored meals are beacons of hope. This donation, part of the Hunger Challenge initiative, is more than a charitable act—it’s a strategic move to address a critical social determinant of health.

The Food Insecurity Challenge

Food insecurity is a widespread problem in the United States, affecting millions of households, including a significant number of older adults. According to the Food Research & Action Center (FRAC), older adults, especially those aged 50-59, face higher rates of food insecurity than those aged 65 and older. Structural factors, such as systemic racism, exacerbate these disparities, particularly among Black, Latinx, and LGBT older adults.

“Health care providers recognize the critical role of food security in patient health,” notes a FRAC survey, highlighting that nearly all respondents agreed that screening for food insecurity is important, and that it contributes to poor health outcomes among older adults.

Medically Tailored Meals: A Proven Solution

Medically tailored meals (MTMs) are designed to meet the specific dietary needs of individuals with chronic illnesses. These meals are not just about providing calories—they ensure recipients get the necessary nutrients to manage their health conditions effectively.

A study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine showed that for food-insecure individuals with diabetes, medically tailored meals improved dietary quality, reduced food insecurity, and decreased hypoglycemia incidents. The meals were customized to the medical needs of each participant, demonstrating significant health benefits.

“Medically tailored meals go further,” says a report from Meals on Wheels, “providing nutritional support that aids in patient recovery and helps older adults maintain their independence.”

Bridging the Gap with Public-Private Partnerships

Mom’s Meals’ initiative underscores the importance of public-private partnerships in tackling food insecurity. Chris Choi, CEO of Mom’s Meals, emphasizes this point: “Private-public partnerships are really critical. We’re trying to work more closely with government leaders to provide more coverage and access to nutrition.”

Federal initiatives, like the Food is Medicine project by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), are pivotal in integrating nutrition into healthcare systems. These initiatives recognize that access to nutritious food is essential for health and resilience, a concept Mom’s Meals is putting into practice with their donation.

The Broader Impact on Healthcare

Addressing food insecurity through medically tailored meals has broader implications beyond individual health benefits. Research shows that food insecurity leads to increased use of health services. By providing nutritious meals, healthcare costs associated with diet-related diseases can be reduced significantly.

The FRAC survey found that healthcare providers need more support, including training on connecting patients to nutrition programs and resources, integrating screening efforts into electronic health records, and securing funding for food insecurity interventions.

A Call to Action

The commitment of Mom’s Meals to donate 30,000 meals—more than double their previous year’s contribution—highlights the growing recognition of the role nutrition plays in healthcare. It is a call to action for more stakeholders to join the fight against food insecurity.


Medically tailored meals represent a critical intervention for food-insecure older adults, offering a lifeline that supports their health and independence. Initiatives like those by Mom’s Meals, backed by strategic public-private partnerships and robust policy support, are essential to addressing this pressing issue. As we look towards a future where food is recognized as medicine, it is clear that these efforts are not just beneficial—they are vital.

By recognizing the profound impact of medically tailored meals, we can better support our aging population, ensuring that no one has to choose between hunger and health.


  1. Food Research & Action Center. (2023). Addressing Food Insecurity Among Older Adults: Health Care Provider Beliefs, Practices, and Resources Needed. Retrieved from FRAC Report.
  2. Meals on Wheels People. (2024, February). Medically Tailored Meals Aid Patient Recovery. Retrieved from Meals on Wheels People.
  3. Berkowitz, S. A., Gao, X., & Tucker, K. L. (2014). Food-insecure dietary patterns are associated with poor longitudinal glycemic control in diabetes: Results from the Boston Puerto Rican Health study. Diabetes Care, 37(9), 2587–2592. doi:10.2337/dc14-0753.
  4. Food Research & Action Center. (2017). Hunger & Health: The Impact of Poverty, Food Insecurity, and Poor Nutrition on Health and Well-Being. Retrieved from FRAC Report.
  5. Meals on Wheels America. (2023). An Evidence-Based Solution to Senior Hunger and Isolation. Retrieved from Meals on Wheels America.

Bridging the Gap: The Bipartisan Effort to Transform Caregiver Training

In a significant move poised to revolutionize the landscape of caregiver education and workforce development, Congress is on the brink of passing legislation that could fundamentally alter how new workers are trained for the long-term care sector. The Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act (H.R. 6585), heralded for its potential to democratize access to essential training, has garnered wide-ranging support, not least from LeadingAge, a prominent advocate for nonprofit and mission-driven aging services providers.

A Historic Crisis and a Beacon of Hope

The United States’ healthcare system, particularly the long-term care sector, is navigating through uncharted territories, exacerbated by the aftershocks of the COVID-19 pandemic. A crisis in the workforce has been looming, marked by a shortage of Direct Care Workers (DCWs) – a shortfall that has deepened in the pandemic’s wake. The legislation comes as a beacon of hope against this backdrop, promising to address the urgent need for skilled caregivers.

“The U.S. Healthcare system is navigating a new and unfamiliar landscape in the wake of the Covid-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE)… the demand for direct care workers is high and is only expected to increase as our population ages,” LeadingAge states in a compelling letter to Congress, underscoring the urgency of the situation.

With over 5,400 provider members serving millions of older adults, LeadingAge’s advocacy highlights a critical juncture: the demand for direct care workers is soaring, exacerbated by a demographic shift towards an aging population. Yet, barriers to accessing training programs have stifled potential growth in this workforce.

The Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act: A Game-Changer

The act proposes to make short-term workforce training programs eligible for federal aid through the Pell Grant program. This marks a significant shift from the existing requirements, which have historically excluded many aspiring caregivers from accessing the financial support needed to pursue their education and enter the field.

Crucially, the legislation aims to lower the threshold for training program eligibility, making high-quality, short-term post-secondary education accessible to those with low incomes. This initiative not only opens pathways to fulfilling, family-sustaining careers in long-term care but also addresses the critical pipeline of care providers necessary to meet the needs of America’s aging population.

The Human Impact: Empowering Direct Care Workers

According to recent reports, more than 60% of DCWs are people of color, and the vast majority are women. Many enter the aging services field through short-term training programs. By making these programs more accessible, the Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act stands to empower a significant segment of the workforce, providing them with the tools for economic sustainability and professional advancement, without the burden of insurmountable debt. LeadingAge’s letter to Congress reflects on this, emphasizing, “Lowering the required length of training required to access the Pell Grant will open a world of employment opportunities and financial empowerment to low-income Americans.”

Why It Matters: Navigating the Demographic Shift

As the United States stands on the cusp of a significant demographic shift, the implications for the long-term care sector and the demand for direct care workers become increasingly pressing. The population projections for the coming decades sketch a future where the aging population will nearly double, and the ripple effects on the healthcare system, particularly long-term care, will be profound.

The Surge in the Aging Population

According to the Direct Care Workers in the United States policy research released by PHI, from 2016 to 2060, the number of adults aged 65 and older is projected to balloon from 49.2 million to an astounding 94.7 million. Even more striking, the segment of the population aged 85 and older is expected to nearly triple, growing from 6.4 million to 19 million. This exponential growth is not just a statistic; it represents a fundamental transformation in the composition of our society, driving job growth in the direct care workforce to unprecedented levels.

The Caregiver Gap

In stark contrast to the burgeoning older adult population, the pool of adults aged 18 to 64 is anticipated to remain relatively static. The current caregiver ratio of 31 adults aged 18 to 64 for every one adult aged 85 and older is poised to shrink dramatically to just 12 to 1 by 2060. This narrowing gap underscores a looming challenge: a potential shortage of both paid and unpaid caregivers available to support the burgeoning needs of older adults.

A Diverse and Complex Care Landscape

Compounding these challenges, the demographic composition of the older adult population itself is evolving. By 2060, projections indicate that nearly half (45 percent) of older adults will be of color, up from 23 percent in 2016, and the proportion of older adults who are immigrants will rise from 14 percent to 23 percent. These shifts not only signal a more diverse aging population but also amplify the need for cultural and linguistic competency within the direct care workforce. Recognizing and valuing the diverse backgrounds, experiences, and barriers of care workers themselves will be crucial in meeting these changing needs.

The Rise of Chronic Conditions

Adding another layer of complexity, the prevalence of chronic conditions, such as Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia, is increasing alongside the growth of the older adult population. Currently, about 1 in 9 individuals aged 65 and over are living with Alzheimer’s disease, the most common form of dementia. This number is set to more than double by 2060, elevating the demand for specialized direct care workers capable of supporting individuals with complex health needs.

The Urgent Call for Action

The Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act is a timely response to these challenges. By expanding access to short-term workforce training programs, the act aims to equip a new generation of direct care workers with the skills necessary to meet the demands of a rapidly aging and diversifying population. This legislation is not just a policy initiative; it’s an essential step toward preparing our nation to provide compassionate, competent care to older adults, ensuring they receive the support they deserve in the years to come.

Looking Ahead: A Unified Call to Action

“On behalf of the 5400 mission-driven providers that work with older adults and their families to provide dignified quality care and services, I urge you to vote ‘yes’ on The Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act,” urges Katie Smith Sloan, President & CEO of LeadingAge, in a heartfelt plea to Congress.

As the bill awaits further action in Congress, the long-term care community watches with bated breath. The promise of the Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act is not just in the numbers but in the lives it stands to change: the caregivers who form the backbone of our healthcare system and the older adults they serve. In endorsing this act, Congress has the opportunity to lay the groundwork for a future where quality care is underpinned by accessible, comprehensive caregiver education.

Alone Together: A Comprehensive Look at Loneliness and Public Health 

In the heart of Silicon Valley, a groundbreaking declaration has emerged from San Mateo County, marking a pivotal moment in public health history. For the first time in the United States, loneliness has been officially recognized as a public health emergency, shedding light on an issue that, while often hidden in the shadows, impacts millions of lives with profound intensity. This bold move by San Mateo County is not merely a local policy shift but a clarion call to the nation, highlighting the urgent need to address the silent epidemic of loneliness that pervades our society. 

Loneliness, a complex and deeply personal experience, transcends mere physical isolation, affecting individuals of all ages, yet it disproportionately impacts older adults. The implications of this declaration extend far beyond the borders of Silicon Valley, resonating with a global challenge that has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, but has long been simmering beneath the surface of our interconnected world. As populations around the globe continue to age, the issue of loneliness emerges as a critical concern, demanding attention not only for its emotional toll but also for its significant health ramifications. 

Research has consistently shown that prolonged loneliness can lead to a myriad of health issues, including increased risks of mental health disorders, heart disease, and premature mortality, making it a silent killer lurking in the shadows of our community life. The recognition of loneliness as a public health emergency by San Mateo County is a watershed moment, signaling a shift in how we perceive and address the well-being of our communities. It underscores the importance of collective action, innovative solutions, and compassionate policies to bridge the gaps that divide us, fostering a society where no one has to suffer the debilitating effects of loneliness in silence. 

As we delve into the complexities of loneliness, its prevalence, impacts, and the multifaceted approaches required to combat it, we embark on a journey to understand and mitigate one of the most pressing health crises of our time. This article aims to illuminate the paths through which we can address loneliness, drawing on insights from San Mateo County’s pioneering declaration, notable research, and the concerted efforts of health organizations worldwide. Together, we can confront this issue head-on, paving the way for a healthier, more connected future for all. 

The Prevalence and Impact of Loneliness 

Loneliness, often described as a subjective feeling of isolation, has quietly burgeoned into a global health epidemic, touching lives across every demographic. A systematic review and meta-analysis, encompassing a broad swath of the global population, underscores the pervasiveness of this issue. This research reveals that loneliness is not confined by geography, age, or socioeconomic status, but is a universal experience with significant variability across different groups. The findings suggest that certain demographics, particularly older adults, are at a heightened risk, highlighting the critical need for targeted interventions. 

The health ramifications of prolonged loneliness are profound and far-reaching. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has drawn direct correlations between loneliness and a host of serious health conditions, including heart disease, stroke, mental health disorders, and premature mortality. This connection underscores the urgency of addressing loneliness not merely as a social issue but as a critical public health concern. The CDC’s findings serve as a clarion call to action, emphasizing that the stakes of inaction are not only quality of life but life itself. 

San Mateo County, in declaring loneliness a public health emergency, has brought to light the acute nature of this crisis. The declaration itself, a bold move, reflects the immediacy of the issue, and not a moment too soon. According to a recent poll released by the American Psychiatric Association, 1 in 3 Americans said they felt lonely at least once a week over the past year.  

Last year, the U.S. Surgeon General released an official report stating that the damaging effects of loneliness and social isolation areas deadly to one’s health as smoking 15 cigarettes a day. This stark comparison not only serves to shock the conscience but also to illuminate the severity of loneliness as a public health threat. It is a poignant reminder of the invisible burdens many carry and the silent toll these burdens take on individual and community health. 

This declaration, supported by empirical evidence from research and the authoritative stance of the CDC, paints a vivid picture of loneliness as an urgent public health issue. It is a multifaceted challenge that demands a multifaceted response, encompassing public awareness, healthcare interventions, and community-based solutions. As we delve deeper into the impacts of loneliness, it becomes clear that the fight against this silent epidemic is not just a matter of social connection but a crucial battleground for the health and well-being of our global community. The time to act is now, with both compassion and determination, to weave a stronger social fabric that leaves no one behind. 

Measuring Loneliness: Challenges and Tools 

In the quest to combat loneliness, one of the primary hurdles is its measurement. Given the subjective nature of loneliness, accurately assessing its presence and intensity poses significant challenges. However, advancements in psychological research have led to the development of reliable tools designed to quantify this elusive experience. Among these, the UCLA Loneliness Scale and the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale stand out for their comprehensive approach and widespread use in both research and clinical settings. 

The UCLA Loneliness Scale, a benchmark in the field, offers a nuanced assessment through a series of statements that respondents rate based on their feelings of connection and isolation. This scale has been instrumental in shedding light on the depths of loneliness across various populations, providing valuable insights into the prevalence and intensity of loneliness experienced by individuals. Its robustness and sensitivity make it a crucial tool in both understanding and addressing the nuances of loneliness. 

Similarly, the de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale offers another avenue for measuring loneliness, with a focus on both emotional and social loneliness. This scale delves into the quality of an individual’s relationships and their perceived social support, providing a dual perspective that enriches our understanding of loneliness. Its application across diverse groups has contributed to a more holistic view of loneliness, emphasizing the importance of both intimate attachments and broader social networks. 

The importance of accurate measurement cannot be overstated. By identifying those at greatest risk and understanding the specific nature of their loneliness, interventions can be tailored more effectively. Accurate measurement tools enable healthcare providers, policymakers, and community leaders to deploy resources where they are most needed, designing interventions that address both the symptoms and the underlying causes of loneliness. From social prescribing to community engagement initiatives, the foundation of any successful intervention is a deep understanding of the loneliness landscape, as revealed through these sophisticated measuring tools. 

In this light, the UCLA and de Jong Gierveld scales are more than just assessment tools; they are the compasses guiding us toward more compassionate, informed, and effective responses to loneliness. By embracing the challenges of measurement, we unlock the potential for transformative action, paving the way for a future where no one must navigate the perils of loneliness alone. As we refine these tools and develop new methodologies, our capacity to illuminate the shadows of loneliness expands, bringing hope and connection to those who need it most. 

Systemic Interventions and The Role of Healthcare 

In the battle against loneliness, the healthcare system emerges as a frontline defender, uniquely positioned to identify and address this silent epidemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) underscores the importance of healthcare interventions in combating loneliness, recognizing the critical role healthcare providers play in identifying at-risk individuals through routine interactions and assessments. The CDC’s recommendations highlight a pathway for integrating loneliness assessments into standard healthcare practices, leveraging the trust and communication established between patients and healthcare providers. 

One specific strategy championed by the CDC is the implementation of established loneliness assessment tools, such as the Berkman-Syme Social Network Index and the UCLA Loneliness Scale, within clinical settings. These tools not only facilitate the identification of loneliness but also help quantify its severity, enabling healthcare providers to tailor interventions that address the specific needs of their patients. The Berkman-Syme Social Network Index, for example, assesses the extent of an individual’s social connections and support networks, providing valuable insights into potential social isolation. Meanwhile, the UCLA Loneliness Scale offers a direct measure of perceived loneliness, allowing for a nuanced understanding of an individual’s subjective experience. 

The potential of healthcare interventions to mitigate loneliness is significant. As the CDC articulates, “For those without social connections, a doctor’s appointment or visit from a home health nurse may be one of the few face-to-face encounters they have.” This statement highlights the unique opportunity healthcare providers have to make a meaningful impact on their patients’ well-being beyond traditional medical care. By integrating loneliness assessments into routine care, healthcare professionals can identify individuals suffering in silence, connect them with appropriate resources, and initiate conversations that break down the stigmas associated with loneliness. 

Moreover, healthcare systems are encouraged to go beyond individual assessments and engage in broader community health initiatives aimed at reducing loneliness. This can include social prescribing, where healthcare providers refer patients to community activities and support services, and the development of partnerships with local organizations to build more robust support networks for isolated individuals. 

In essence, the healthcare system’s role in addressing loneliness extends from the examination room into the community, embodying a holistic approach to health that recognizes the interconnectedness of physical, mental, and social well-being. Through systemic interventions and a commitment to recognizing loneliness as a significant health concern, healthcare providers can play a pivotal role in alleviating the burden of loneliness, one patient at a time. 

Global Perspectives on Loneliness Interventions 

The global perspective on interventions to combat loneliness among older adults offers a diverse and insightful understanding of strategies that various countries and organizations have implemented to address this pressing issue. The World Health Organization (WHO) emphasizes that social isolation and loneliness are significant yet often overlooked social determinants of health across all ages, including older people. High-quality social connections are crucial to mental and physical health and well-being​​. 

In some countries, up to one in three older individuals report feeling lonely, highlighting the widespread nature of this issue. The impact of social isolation and loneliness on older adults is profound, affecting their longevity, physical and mental health, and overall quality of life. The consequences of loneliness have been compared to well-established mortality risk factors such as smoking, obesity, and physical inactivity​​. 

Interventions to mitigate loneliness and social isolation among older adults are varied, encompassing both face-to-face and digital approaches. These strategies include social skills training, community and support groups, befriending services, and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Additionally, the creation of age-friendly communities through improved access to transportation and information and communication technologies (ICT) can significantly reduce loneliness. Laws and policies targeting marginalization and discrimination also play a critical role in fostering social connections​​. 

Globally, the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing (2021-2030) serves as a pivotal framework within which WHO and its partners are intensifying efforts to address social isolation and loneliness. This includes developing guidelines for implementing and scaling up effective interventions, enhancing research to strengthen the evidence base for what works, and forming a global coalition to elevate the political priority of these issues among older adults​​. 

Specific country examples and innovative approaches further illustrate the global response to loneliness: 

  • Japan: Recognizing the increasing issue of loneliness among its aging population, Japan has appointed a Minister of Loneliness to combat social isolation. This innovative governmental approach aims to coordinate efforts and implement comprehensive strategies to address loneliness at a national level. 
  • United Kingdom: The UK has pioneered the appointment of a Minister for Loneliness and launched the “Let’s Talk Loneliness” campaign, which aims to break the stigmas around loneliness and encourage people to talk about it. The UK also supports community-based interventions, including social prescribing, which connects individuals to community services and activities to reduce loneliness. 
  • Australia: The Australian government has funded programs like FriendLine, a service providing older adults with opportunities for conversation and companionship. This initiative is part of a broader strategy to tackle loneliness through community engagement and support. 
  • United States: Community-based interventions, such as the creation of intergenerational living situations and technology-based programs to connect older adults with their peers, are part of the US’s approach to reducing loneliness. Programs like the “Senior Planet” and “Connect2Affect” seek to use technology to enhance social connections among older adults. 

These global perspectives underline the necessity of a multifaceted approach to combating loneliness, involving government action, community-based strategies, and the leveraging of technology to foster social connections. The effectiveness of these interventions highlights the importance of collaboration between governments, NGOs, the healthcare sector, and communities to address the complex issue of loneliness among older adults. 

Challenges and Opportunities 

In the section, we explore the multifaceted issue of combating loneliness, highlighting both the obstacles that need to be navigated and the potential pathways forward. This discussion is enriched by insights drawn from recent studies and articles that underscore the complexity of the issue and suggest innovative strategies for addressing it. 


Stigma and Social Perception: One of the significant challenges in addressing loneliness is the stigmas associated with admitting feelings of isolation. Social perceptions often equate loneliness with personal failure or social undesirability, which can deter individuals from seeking help. This stigmas is reinforced by societal norms that value independence and self-reliance, making it difficult for people to acknowledge their struggles with loneliness without fear of judgment​​. 

Diversity of Affected Populations: Loneliness does not discriminate, affecting individuals across all demographics. However, the causes and experiences of loneliness can vary significantly among different populations, including seniors, young adults, and minority groups. Each group may face unique barriers to connection, from mobility issues and technological gaps to social anxiety and digital isolation. Tailoring interventions to meet the diverse needs of these groups remains a challenge​​. 

Resource Allocation: Effective interventions require adequate resources, both in terms of funding and access to support services. However, resource allocation often falls short, especially in underserved communities or regions with limited mental health services. The disparity in access to care exacerbates the loneliness epidemic, leaving many without the help they need​​. 


Technology as a Connector: While technology is often criticized for contributing to feelings of isolation, it also holds significant potential as a tool for combating loneliness. Innovations in social media, virtual reality, and online platforms can facilitate connections that transcend geographical barriers. These technologies can offer novel ways to engage in meaningful interactions, support group activities, and access mental health resources​​. 

Community-Based Solutions: Grassroots and community-based initiatives present a promising avenue for creating social connections. By focusing on local needs and leveraging community assets, these programs can foster a sense of belonging and support. Examples include intergenerational programs that connect seniors with younger volunteers, community centers that offer social activities, and outreach programs designed to engage those at risk of social isolation​​. 

Leveraging Research and Policy: Recent studies underscore the importance of evidence-based approaches in addressing loneliness. By understanding the underlying factors and effective interventions, policymakers and practitioners can implement strategies that have a real impact. Additionally, increasing awareness and advocacy can help shift societal attitudes and promote policies that prioritize mental health and social connection​​. 

While the challenges in combating loneliness are significant, the opportunities for innovation and intervention are equally compelling. By addressing the stigmas, acknowledging the diversity of affected populations, and strategically allocating resources, we can make strides in mitigating loneliness. Leveraging technology, community-based solutions, and evidence-based policy can pave the way for a more connected and mentally healthy society. 

In Conclusion 

In the face of the loneliness epidemic, our collective response must be as multifaceted and diverse as the problem itself. The declaration of loneliness as a public health emergency by San Mateo County serves not just as a wake-up call but as a beacon of hope for meaningful change. By harnessing technology, fostering community connections, and prioritizing mental health in public policy, we can begin to dismantle the barriers of isolation that plague our society. The journey towards a more connected and supportive community is complex and challenging, yet undeniably critical. As we move forward, let us embrace the opportunity to transform our understanding and treatment of loneliness, ensuring that no individual has to navigate the darkness of isolation alone. Together, we can cultivate a society where the warmth of human connection reaches every corner, lighting up the path towards a healthier, more inclusive world. 


  1. Park, Caroline, et al. “The Effect of Loneliness on Distinct Health Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.” Psychiatry Research, vol. 294, Dec. 2020, p. 113514. PubMed,
  1. Hawkley, Louise C. “Loneliness and Health.” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 8, no. 22, 14 Apr. 2022,
  1. Surkalim, Daniel L., et al. “The Prevalence of Loneliness Across 113 Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” BMJ, vol. 376, 9 Feb. 2022,

Empowering Aging in Place: Transforming Elder Care through Expanded Home and Community-Based Services

In an era where the aging population is rapidly growing, the demand for home and community-based services (HCBS) is more critical than ever. These services, designed to support older adults in their preferred living environments, are not just a matter of comfort but of necessity. However, despite the clear need, access to HCBS remains limited for many, leaving a significant portion of the older adult population underserved.

The Unmet Needs and the Call for Expansion

A recent report from the Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis highlighted a startling reality: nearly 20% of adults aged 55 and older struggle with activities of daily living (ADLs), with approximately 8.3 million not receiving the necessary help. ADLs encompass the essential tasks required for independent living, such as bathing, dressing, eating, and moving around the home. Imagine the plight of an older woman who, due to arthritis and mobility issues, finds it increasingly difficult to bathe herself or a veteran who, after serving his country, struggles with the basic task of preparing meals. These are not isolated incidents but represent a significant portion of the aging population.

The report underscores the prohibitive costs of professional care, which often include services like in-home nursing, physical therapy, and round-the-clock assistance. These services, while invaluable, come with a hefty price tag, often running into thousands of dollars monthly, a cost too steep for many older adults and their families. For instance, the average cost of assisted living facilities can range from $3,600 to $6,800 per month, depending on the level of care and location, putting it out of reach for many.

Moreover, the risks associated with unmet care needs are profound. Without adequate support, older adults are more prone to accidents, such as falls that can lead to severe injuries or even fatalities. For example, a simple task like climbing stairs or reaching for an item on a high shelf can become perilous without proper assistance. Additionally, the lack of care can exacerbate existing health conditions, leading to higher disability levels and a diminished quality of life. An older adult recovering from surgery might face a slower and more complicated recovery process without access to physical therapy or proper wound care at home.

This situation puts a spotlight on the urgent need to expand HCBS access, a sentiment echoed by researchers and policymakers alike. Expanding HCBS means not just more availability but also affordability and tailored services to meet diverse needs. It’s about creating a support system that includes meal delivery services for those who cannot cook, transportation services for those who can no longer drive, and personal care aides to assist with daily routines. It’s about ensuring that a grandmother who has spent her life caring for others can receive the care she needs in her own home, surrounded by memories and the comfort of familiarity.

The call for expansion is not just a call for more services but a call for a more compassionate, comprehensive approach to aging. It’s a recognition that supporting our older adults is not just a responsibility but a moral imperative, one that reflects the values of a caring and inclusive society.

The Economic and Social Implications of HCBS Expansion

Expanding Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) isn’t just about improving individual lives; it has broader economic and social implications that ripple through communities and healthcare systems. A study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society illuminated this by revealing that a 1% increase in HCBS spending was associated with significant reductions in the state nursing home population and institutional Medicaid long-term services and supports (LTSS) spending. This finding is a game-changer, suggesting that every dollar invested in HCBS can lead to savings from decreased nursing home use. As Brian E McGarry, one of the study’s authors, astutely notes, “States that expand Medicaid HCBS are able to use these additional dollars to serve more LTSS recipients.”

Let’s break this down with tangible examples. Consider a scenario where a state decides to increase its HCBS funding, thereby enhancing services like in-home personal care, meal delivery, and transportation for medical appointments. As more seniors access these services, the need for nursing home placements diminishes. For instance, an older couple might be able to continue living in their home with the help of a visiting nurse and meal delivery services, rather than moving to a nursing home. This not only preserves their independence and connection to their community but also significantly reduces the cost burden on Medicaid, as in-home services are generally less expensive than institutional care.

The economic implications are profound. Reduced nursing home populations mean lower healthcare costs for states and federal programs like Medicaid. For example, if a state spends $5,000 per month on each nursing home resident and can reduce this population by 100 through expanded HCBS, it saves $500,000 monthly. These funds can then be redirected to support additional HCBS for more residents, creating a positive feedback loop of savings and improved care.

Beyond the dollars and cents, the social implications are equally significant. Expanding HCBS fosters a more inclusive society where older adults can age with dignity in their communities. It acknowledges the deep value of allowing individuals to stay in familiar surroundings, maintain social connections, and live with a sense of autonomy. This shift not only improves the quality of life for older adults but also reduces the emotional and financial strain on families who might otherwise face difficult decisions about long-term care for their loved ones.

Moreover, by keeping older adults more engaged in their communities, we promote intergenerational interaction and the sharing of wisdom and experiences that enrich the social fabric. Communities with robust HCBS programs often see increased volunteerism and civic participation among their older populations, contributing to a vibrant, diverse, and supportive community life.

In essence, the expansion of HCBS is not just a policy adjustment; it’s a societal investment with the potential to transform how we care for our aging population. It’s about building a future where economic and social systems align to support the well-being and dignity of every individual, regardless of age. As we continue to navigate the challenges and opportunities of an aging society, the expansion of HCBS stands out as a beacon of progress, promising a better quality of life for older adults and a more sustainable, compassionate approach to long-term care.

Cultural Sensitivity and Tailored Services

Access barriers to Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) aren’t solely financial; they’re deeply rooted in cultural and informational contexts as well. A cross-sectional survey of caregivers of older Korean Americans shed light on this issue, revealing that the most frequently reported barriers to accessing HCBS were a lack of awareness about the services and care recipient refusal. This isn’t just a statistic; it’s a reflection of the nuanced challenges faced by diverse communities in accessing care.

Consider the case of an older Korean American woman who needs assistance with daily activities but is unaware of the available services due to language barriers and limited outreach in her community. Even if she’s aware, cultural norms valuing self-reliance and family caregiving might lead her to refuse outside help. Similarly, a Latino family might be hesitant to seek services due to fears about immigration status or a lack of culturally competent providers.

These examples underscore the need for HCBS programs to not only be available but also culturally sensitive and tailored to meet the unique needs of diverse populations. It’s about more than translating brochures into different languages; it’s about understanding and respecting cultural norms, building trust within communities, and ensuring that services are delivered in a way that feels respectful and appropriate.

For instance, in communities where there’s a strong preference for family caregiving, HCBS programs might focus on providing respite care and support for family caregivers, rather than just direct services for the older adult. In areas with significant immigrant populations, providers might partner with trusted community organizations to help navigate fears about legal status and confidentiality.

Moreover, training for HCBS providers should include cultural competency modules to ensure they’re equipped to handle the varied beliefs, practices, and needs of the people they serve. For example, a caregiver working with Muslim clients should understand the dietary restrictions and privacy concerns that might arise during care.

Collaborative efforts are crucial in this regard. Healthcare providers, community leaders, and policymakers must work together to develop and implement plans that not only expand HCBS programs but also tailor them to the cultural nuances of the populations they serve. This might involve community focus groups to understand specific needs, partnerships with local organizations to increase outreach and trust, and ongoing feedback mechanisms to continually improve services.

In essence, recognizing and addressing the cultural and informational barriers to accessing HCBS is not just about providing care; it’s about providing care that is respectful, appropriate, and effective. It’s about ensuring that every individual, regardless of their cultural background, has the opportunity to receive the support they need in a way that honors their values and preferences. As our society becomes increasingly diverse, the success of HCBS programs will increasingly depend on their ability to meet these complex and varied needs.

Policy Intentions vs. Practical Implementation

While policy efforts to expand Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) are crucial, they don’t automatically translate into increased access or improved outcomes. This disconnect between policy intentions and practical implementation was starkly illustrated in a study examining the Veterans Health Administration’s post-2001 Millennium Act efforts. Despite the policy’s aim to expand access to HCBS, the study found no significant differences in the probability of veterans using institutional long-term care or receiving paid help with activities of daily living after the policy’s implementation. This gap between the lofty goals set by policymakers and the on-the-ground reality experienced by service users underscores the critical need for robust implementation strategies.

Consider the case of a veteran who, after the Millennium Act, was theoretically eligible for expanded HCBS but continued to struggle to access needed services due to bureaucratic red tape, lack of available providers in his area, or simply not being aware of how to navigate the system to request these services. Or imagine a rural community where the policy promised increased HCBS access, but the lack of local healthcare infrastructure and professionals made this promise impractical.

These scenarios are not just hypothetical; they reflect the real challenges faced by many individuals in need of care. They highlight the multifaceted nature of implementing HCBS expansion policies, which requires more than just legislative action. It requires a detailed understanding of the logistical, administrative, and human factors that can facilitate or hinder access to services.

For instance, effective implementation might involve targeted outreach and education campaigns to ensure that those eligible for services are aware of them and understand how to access them. It might require investment in training and recruiting a workforce capable of meeting the increased demand for HCBS, particularly in underserved areas. It could also necessitate the development of streamlined processes and systems to reduce bureaucratic barriers and make it easier for individuals to receive the services they need.

Moreover, practical implementation requires ongoing monitoring and evaluation to understand the impact of policies and identify areas for improvement. For example, if data shows that certain communities or groups are not benefiting from HCBS expansion as intended, policymakers and administrators can investigate the reasons and adjust their strategies accordingly.

In essence, bridging the gap between policy intentions and practical implementation is a complex but essential task. It requires a comprehensive approach that considers the diverse needs and circumstances of those the policy is intended to serve. It involves collaboration between policymakers, service providers, and the community to ensure that policies are not just well-intentioned but also well-executed. Ultimately, the success of HCBS expansion efforts will be measured not by the policies themselves but by the real, positive changes they bring to the lives of those in need of care.

The Role of Awareness and Social Exposure

Awareness is a critical factor in the utilization of Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS). It’s the bridge that connects potential users with the services designed to support them. A study shedding light on this issue found that an estimated 53% of U.S. adults reported not knowing anyone who had used HCBS, indicating a significant lack of awareness and exposure. This lack of awareness isn’t just a statistic; it’s a barrier preventing many from accessing the support they need to live independently and with dignity.

Imagine a scenario where an older man, let’s call him John, lives alone and is starting to struggle with mobility. He’s unaware that services like in-home care assistants or transportation services exist and continues to try to manage on his own, risking falls and isolation. Or consider Maria, a daughter caring for her aging mother, who doesn’t know that respite care is available to give her a much-needed break. These individuals represent the many who could benefit from HCBS but are left in the dark due to a lack of awareness.

Increasing public awareness of HCBS is crucial and can take many forms. For example, healthcare providers can play a key role by discussing HCBS as part of routine care for older adults and their families. Community workshops and informational sessions can be held in local libraries, senior centers, and places of worship to educate the public about available services. Even something as simple as brochures in a doctor’s office or posters in a community center can make a difference.

Social exposure is equally important. People are more likely to utilize services if they know others who have also used them. This can be facilitated through community support groups where individuals can share their experiences and provide recommendations. For instance, a support group for caregivers might invite members who have used respite care to speak about their experiences, providing real-life testimonials that can encourage others to explore similar options.

Moreover, stories and testimonials from HCBS users can be shared through local media, social media, and community newsletters. Hearing or reading about a neighbor or fellow community member’s positive experience with HCBS can demystify the services and make them seem more accessible and acceptable.

Enhancing readiness for aging in place is another critical aspect of increasing awareness. Educational campaigns can emphasize not just the immediate benefits of HCBS but also how these services can contribute to a longer-term strategy for maintaining independence and quality of life. For example, a campaign might feature stories of individuals who, thanks to HCBS, were able to remain in their homes and communities, continuing to participate in activities they love and maintain connections with friends and family.

In essence, increasing awareness and social exposure to HCBS isn’t just about disseminating information; it’s about fostering a community culture that recognizes and values the support these services provide. It’s about ensuring that every individual knows that if they ever need support, there are options available to help them maintain their independence and quality of life. As we strive to create a society that supports its aging population, the role of awareness and social exposure in HCBS utilization cannot be overstated. It’s the foundation upon which accessible, compassionate, and effective care is built.

Moving Forward: A Call to Action

The evidence is clear: expanding access to Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) can significantly impact the well-being of older adults and the broader healthcare system. However, realizing this potential requires a multifaceted approach involving increased funding, public education, culturally sensitive outreach, and robust policy implementation. As we look to the future, it’s imperative that stakeholders across the spectrum — from policymakers to healthcare providers to community organizations — work collaboratively to ensure that all older adults have the support they need to live with dignity and independence in their communities.

Increased funding is the bedrock of expanding HCBS. Consider the potential impact if states increased their investment in HCBS, not only enhancing the quantity but also the quality of services. For example, additional funds could be used to train caregivers in specialized care for conditions like dementia or to provide more comprehensive services, including nutrition counseling and physical therapy.

Public education is equally crucial. Imagine a nationwide campaign that informs older adults and their families about the benefits of HCBS, how to access them, and success stories of those who have improved their quality of life through these services. Such initiatives could significantly increase utilization and support for HCBS.

Culturally sensitive outreach is essential to ensure that HCBS are accessible and relevant to all communities. This might involve partnering with community leaders and organizations to develop and deliver services that respect and incorporate cultural values and preferences. For instance, an HCBS program in a predominantly Hispanic community might include Spanish-speaking caregivers and culturally appropriate meals.

Robust policy implementation is the final piece of the puzzle. It’s not enough to pass laws expanding HCBS; these policies must be effectively implemented to make a real difference. This involves ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and adjustment to ensure that services are reaching those in need and having the intended impact. For example, if a new policy aims to reduce the waiting time for HCBS, regular assessments are needed to ensure that this goal is being met and to identify any barriers to timely service delivery.

In the words of Jordan M Harrison, author of a study on Medicaid-supported expanded access to HCBS, “The findings suggest that implementation of mandatory [HCBS] was associated with less nursing home use among dual enrollees with dementia and that [HCBS] may help prevent or delay nursing home placement among older adults.” This sentiment captures the essence of the HCBS mission: not just to care, but to empower and enable a life of quality and dignity.

As we move forward, it’s crucial that this call to action is heeded. It’s not just about improving individual lives; it’s about creating a society that values and supports its older members, recognizing that their well-being is integral to the health and vitality of the community as a whole. By working together, we can ensure that HCBS are not just an option but a cornerstone of aging with dignity and independence.


The rapidly growing aging population urgently needs expanded access to Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) to live with dignity and independence. Despite the clear demand, many older adults struggle with daily activities and face prohibitive care costs, leaving them underserved. Expanding HCBS has profound economic and social benefits, reducing institutional care costs and fostering inclusive communities. However, challenges like cultural barriers and policy implementation gaps must be addressed. A multifaceted approach involving increased funding, public education, and culturally sensitive outreach is essential. Stakeholders must collaborate to ensure effective policy implementation and increased awareness, ultimately empowering older adults to age in place gracefully.


  1. Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis. (2023). Addressing the unmet care needs of older adults: A pressing need for expanded access to home and community-based services. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from
  2. McGarry, B. E. (2023). Medicaid home and community-based services spending for older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from
  3. Casado, B. L. (2012). Access barriers to and unmet needs for home- and community-based services among older adults. Home Health Care Services Quarterly. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from
  4. Jacobs, J. C. (2021). Long-term care service mix in the Veterans Health Administration: Mandating access to HCBS does not necessarily imply access. Health Services Research. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from
  5. Siconolfi, D. (2023). Low Exposure to Home- and Community-Based Services Among Older Adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from
  6. Harrison, J. M. (2023). Changes in Nursing Home Use Following Medicaid-Supported Expanded Access to Home- and Community-Based Services for Older Adults With Dementia. JAMA Network Open. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from

Bridging the Gap: The Urgent Need to Reform America’s Older Adult Care System

In the older years of life, every individual deserves the dignity of care and support. Yet, in the United States, a silent crisis is unfolding. A significant portion of aging adults face their daily struggles alone, without the necessary care and assistance. This issue, deeply rooted in the systemic reliance on family for Older Adult Care, leaves those without family or sufficient wealth particularly vulnerable.

The Stark Reality of Unmet Needs

Imagine a day in the life of an older adult struggling with basic tasks like dressing or preparing meals. Now, picture that person reaching out for help, only to find no one there. This is the reality for 8.3 million people, or 42 percent of adults who have difficulty with these tasks and did not receive any help in 2020. This alarming statistic from a policy note by the Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis is like a canary in a coal mine, signaling a deeper, more pervasive issue in the U.S. Older Adult Care system.

The consequences of unmet care needs are profoundly serious and far-reaching. Older adults lacking essential support are more prone to accidents, such as falls that can lead to hip fractures, a common and severe injury among older adults that often leads to long-term disability and increased dependency. Without help for daily tasks, these individuals might struggle with medication management, leading to preventable hospitalizations due to incorrect dosages or missed treatments.

They also face more negative health outcomes, including a higher incidence of chronic conditions worsening due to neglect or improper care. Increased disability levels are another significant concern, as older adults might find their mobility and independence rapidly diminishing when they don’t receive the necessary assistance, turning once-manageable tasks into insurmountable challenges. This lack of support not only diminishes their quality of life but also places a heavier burden on healthcare systems.

The Dependency Dilemma

America’s Older Adult Care system is heavily dependent on unpaid family caregivers. This model, while rooted in familial responsibility, overlooks the changing dynamics of modern society. With declining marriage and fertility rates, and higher divorce rates, the future looks bleak for aging individuals without a family support system. The policy note highlights that “there are 7.2 million adults over the age of 55 who have no spouse and no living offspring,” underscoring the growing segment of the population at risk of neglect. It’s like expecting a garden to thrive without a gardener to tend to it.

Wealth: Not a Guarantee for Care

Contrary to what many might assume, having wealth does not necessarily guarantee care. The research reveals a counter-intuitive result: significant shares of people across all wealth quartiles do not receive the care they need. It’s like owning a car but not having access to a mechanic. “Only 23 percent of adults aged 55 and older who have difficulty with one or more ADLs or IADLs received some care from a paid professional,” the policy note states. This finding indicates that the issue transcends economic boundaries, affecting individuals across the wealth spectrum.

A Call for Systemic Reform

The current state of affairs calls for urgent systemic reform. Expanding Community Medicaid is proposed as a viable solution. This program provides financial subsidies for care services in homes or communities, yet its accessibility varies significantly across states. The policy note argues for expanding access and raising enrollment caps, especially in states with long waiting lists or low-income and asset-eligibility caps. It’s akin to opening more lanes on a congested highway to allow more traffic to flow.

The Path Forward

As America grapples with this growing crisis, it’s clear that a multifaceted approach is needed. Expanding Community Medicaid is just the start. The nation must also invest in innovative care solutions, support caregiver networks, and foster a culture that values and supports its aging population. It’s like repairing a bridge while also building new ones to ensure everyone can cross safely.

In the words of Forden and Ghilarducci, “Expanding access to benefits like Community Medicaid will help Americans across the wealth spectrum get help without having to rely on unpaid family caregiving or pay for high-cost professional care.” It’s a poignant reminder that in the pursuit of a more caring society, no one should be left behind.

As policymakers, stakeholders, and communities ponder the future of Older Adult Care in America, the time for action is now. By bridging the gap in care, we can ensure that the later years are marked by dignity, support, and compassion, not neglect and struggle. It’s about building a society that holds every life as precious, supporting each other from the first steps to the last.


In the U.S., a crisis in Older Adult Care leaves millions of aging adults without necessary support, leading to serious health consequences and increased dependency. Despite the common belief, wealth doesn’t guarantee care, with many across all economic levels struggling to receive needed assistance. The system’s heavy reliance on unpaid family caregivers fails those without close family ties, a situation exacerbated by changing societal dynamics. Urgent systemic reform is needed, with expanding Community Medicaid proposed as a key solution to provide financial aid for care services. A multifaceted approach is essential, including innovative care solutions and support networks, to ensure a dignified, supported, and compassionate environment for all aging individuals.


Forden, J., & Ghilarducci, T. (2023). U.S. Caregiving System Leaves Significant Unmet Needs Among Aging Adults. Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis at The New School for Social Research. Retrieved December 22, 2023, from

Embracing the Older Adult Workforce: The Untapped Potential of Older Workers

In an era of rapidly changing demographics and evolving workplace dynamics, a crucial segment of the workforce demands our attention – older workers. As we grapple with the challenges and opportunities presented by an aging population, it’s time to shed light on the immense value and untapped potential of this often-overlooked demographic.

Rising Numbers, Rising Opportunities

According to a study by Bain & Company, by 2030, older workers will fill an astounding 150 million jobs globally, exceeding a quarter of the workforce in high-income countries. This shift reflects a broader trend: fewer young people entering the workforce and a trend toward later retirement. In countries like Japan, Italy, and Germany, older workers are expected to make up around 30% to 40% of the workforce by the end of the decade. Even in nations like China and Brazil, the proportion of workers over 55 is noticeably increasing​​​​.

Busting Myths: The Reality of Older Workers

Contrary to prevalent myths, older workers are not a liability but an asset. The National Center for Productive Aging and Work underlines that older workers bring experience, know-how, reliability, work ethic, professionalism, and loyalty. Misconceptions such as older workers being frequently sick or less productive are countered by evidence showing their adaptability, safety-consciousness, and valuable contributions to organizational citizenship​​​​.

Legal and Policy Implications

Despite these positives, age discrimination remains a concern. A striking example is the recent case where pharmaceutical company Lilly USA agreed to pay $2.4 million to settle a nationwide age discrimination lawsuit. This highlights the ongoing legal and ethical implications of not adequately integrating older workers into our workplaces​​.

The Business Case for Older Workers

The business case for hiring older workers is strong. Boston Consulting Group found that companies with diverse management teams, including age diversity, report significantly higher innovation revenue. Gary A. Officer, president and CEO of the Center for Workforce Inclusion, emphasizes the unique skills older workers bring, such as relationship building, negotiating, and leadership. These skills are increasingly vital in an era dominated by artificial intelligence and rapid technological advancement​​.

Strategies for Integration

To fully leverage the potential of older workers, companies need to rethink their recruitment and retention strategies. This involves offering flexibility, remote working opportunities, and considering the specific needs of older workers. Skills-based hiring, rather than focusing on age, can attract a diverse range of applicants with valuable experience. By embracing age diversity, companies not only foster a more inclusive culture but also enhance their performance and adaptability in a competitive market​​.

A Call to Action

As Elizabeth White, author and aging solutions advocate, aptly puts it, “We’re stuck in a time warp about what it means to be an older adult.” It’s time to change our framework and perception. With the right policies and attitudes, the older adult workforce can be a goldmine of talent and experience, ready to be tapped into for the betterment of our businesses and society at large​​.

This article is not just a call to action but a roadmap to embracing the full spectrum of workforce diversity. By valuing and integrating older workers, we not only address a pressing societal need but also unlock a wealth of knowledge, experience, and stability that can drive our businesses and economies forward. The future of work is not just about the young; it’s about the young at heart, the experienced, and the wise. Let’s build a workforce that truly reflects the richness and diversity of our society.

TL;DR: The article “Embracing the Older Adult Workforce: The Untapped Potential of Older Workers” highlights the increasing role of older workers in the global workforce, projected to fill 150 million jobs by 2030. It debunks myths about older workers, showing they bring valuable experience and adaptability to the workplace. Despite this, age discrimination remains a challenge, as seen in legal cases like Lilly USA’s $2.4 million settlement. Businesses benefit from diverse age representation, with evidence of higher innovation revenue in such companies. The article calls for a shift in recruitment and retention strategies to embrace older workers’ unique skills and needs, emphasizing the strategic advantages of an age-diverse workforce for business success and societal progress.


  1. Bain & Company. (2023). Older workers will fill 150 million more jobs globally by 2030, exceeding a quarter of the workforce in high-income countries. Retrieved from
  2. HR Dive. (2023). Employers in ‘time warp’ about older workers. Retrieved from
  3. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2023). Clearing Up Myths About Older Workers While Understanding and Supporting an Aging Workforce. Retrieved from
  4. Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2023). Why Companies Should Hire Older Workers. Retrieved from
  5. White, E. (2023). Remarks on older workers. Quoted in “Workforce equity: Employers stuck in ‘time warp’ about older workers”.

Amplifying Voices: The Legacy and Significance of Residents’ Rights Month

In the bustling world of long-term care, October stands out as a beacon of reflection, celebration, and advocacy. This month, known as the Residents’ Rights Month, is not just another mark on the calendar but a powerful reminder of the commitment we owe to our elderly and the rights they deserve.

A Journey Back in Time

The inception of Residents’ Rights Month can be traced back to 1981. It began as the Residents’ Rights Week during a pivotal meeting of the Consumer Voice. A group of visionary nursing home residents, representing various parts of the U.S., felt the pressing need for a dedicated time to celebrate their rights. Their passion and determination led to a successful petition to Congress, resulting in the designation of a “Residents’ Rights Day.” Senators Claude Pepper (D-FL) and David Pryor (D-AR) championed their cause, introducing a Congressional Resolution to cement this initiative.

Fast forward to 2011, and the week-long celebration was expanded to an entire month, giving it the gravitas and attention it rightfully deserved.

The Heart of the Matter

But why is this month so crucial for leaders and caregivers in long-term care centers? Residents’ Rights Month serves as an annual reminder of the Nursing Home Reform Law of 1987. This landmark legislation promises quality of life, quality of care, and unalienable rights for each resident. It’s a testament to the tireless efforts of thousands who collaborate daily to ensure that dignity, privacy, and other basic human rights are not just words on paper but a lived reality for residents.

This Year’s Clarion Call: “Amplify Our Voices”

The theme for this year, “Amplify Our Voices,” is a rallying cry for the community of long-term care residents. It’s an invitation for residents to be vocal about their preferences, share their rich tapestry of experiences, and narrate their unique stories. After all, their voices are the most crucial at the decision-making table.

For leaders and caregivers, this theme underscores the importance of active listening, fostering an environment where residents feel empowered to express themselves, and ensuring that their choices and preferences are always at the forefront.

Join the Movement

Consumer Voice, the torchbearer of this tradition since 1981, encourages everyone involved in long-term care to make Residents’ Rights Month special. Whether it’s through educational programs, festive events, or personal reflections, there’s an opportunity for everyone to contribute.

For those who are planning celebrations or initiatives, Consumer Voice is keen to highlight these efforts on their platform. It’s a chance to showcase best practices, innovative ideas, and heartwarming stories that can inspire others in the community.

A Few Resources to Get Started With

  • 2023 Edition of the Residents’ Rights Month Enrichment Booklet—this complimentary booklet for long-term care residents has a variety of activities aiming to keep residents mentally engaged, prompt self-reflection, and helping residents meet and get to know the community of people around them. You can download a free printable copy to distribute in your care center by visiting this link.
  • Fact Sheet: Communication Tips—this complimentary fact sheet can be made available to serve as a starting point for opening lines of clear and direct communication between families, residents and their caregivers. You can download a copy of this fact sheet by visiting this link.
  • Fact Sheet: 6 Steps for Getting Quality Care in a Nursing Home— a downloadable fact sheet that’s perfect for handing out to both residents and their families. You can download this free fact sheet by visiting this link.
  • Resident Worksheet: My Personal Directives of Quality Living—this downloadable worksheet can be printed and distributed to residents and provides an opportunity to celebrate the dignity and rights of every individual receiving long-term services and supports. You can download this free worksheet by visiting this link.

In Conclusion

Residents’ Rights Month is more than a celebration; it’s a commitment. As leaders and caregivers, let’s take this opportunity to reaffirm our dedication to the rights and well-being of our residents. Let’s amplify their voices, honor their stories, and ensure that every day in our care centers resonates with the spirit of this significant month.

For more information or to share your Residents’ Rights Month celebrations, reach out to Consumer Voice at

Ageism in America: A Silent Epidemic Impacting Our Elders

In the heart of American society lies a silent epidemic, one that begins its insidious spread from the tender age of three and continues to cast its shadow well into our twilight years. This is the epidemic of ageism, a deeply entrenched bias that not only affects the self-worth and health of our elders but also has profound economic and societal implications.

The Early Roots of Ageism

Research reveals that age stereotypes are internalized astonishingly early. By the age of three, children are already familiar with age-related stereotypes. These perceptions, often negative, are reinforced throughout their lives, shaping their views and interactions with the elderly.

The Multifaceted Impact of Ageism

Ageism isn’t just about hurt feelings or misconceptions. It intersects with other biases like racism, sexism, and ableism, amplifying their harmful effects. The health implications are startling. Older individuals with a positive self-perception of aging live an average of 7.5 years longer than their counterparts who view aging negatively, according to a recent study by Becca Levy, PhD, a leading researcher on the effects of ageism from Yale University.

But the harm isn’t just personal. Ageism has a broader economic toll. AARP’s recent findings suggest that the U.S. economy lost a staggering $850 billion due to involuntary retirement, underemployment, and unemployment among older workers. Moreover, the World Health Organization reports that ageism added an estimated $63 billion to healthcare costs in just one year.

Ageism in the Spotlight: Media and Healthcare

The media plays a significant role in perpetuating ageist stereotypes. A mere 1.5% of characters on U.S. television are older individuals, often relegated to minor or comedic roles. This portrayal starkly contrasts with the rise of older influencers on platforms like TikTok, who are amassing significant followings and challenging ageist narratives.

Healthcare, a sector that should ideally be free of biases, isn’t immune to ageism. Older adults often find themselves excluded from clinical trials and are less likely to receive preventive care. The demand for geriatricians is set to surge to 30,000 by 2030. Yet, the U.S., with its 7,300 geriatricians, which only 50% practice full-time, is ill-prepared to meet this demand.

A Call to Leaders and Caregivers of Long-Term Care Centers

For leaders and caregivers in long-term care centers, this research is a clarion call. Ageism isn’t just a societal issue; it’s a pressing concern that affects the very individuals under your care.

It’s crucial to challenge and change ageist perceptions within your institutions. This begins with education and awareness, ensuring that staff recognize and counteract their biases. It also involves advocating for better representation of the elderly in media and pushing for more inclusive research in healthcare.

Resources for Leaders and Caregivers of Long-Term Care Centers

Ageism & Culture Advisory Council:

The Ageism & Culture Advisory Council, comprising members of the American Society on Aging, is leading the way, developing anti-ageism resources and championing the recognition of older adults in the arts. Their efforts underscore the importance of a collective approach to tackling ageism.

Age and Ability Inclusion Toolkit for Senior Living

This toolkit has been developed to help guide organizations and individuals toward creating inclusive environments for senior living. Within this toolkit, you will find resources both for individual staff members as well as an organization-wide assessment.

Community Dialogue Guide: Prompting Discussion About Age and Ageism

This practical guide by Leading Age leverages dialogue to prompt community discussion about age and ageism. Unlike debate, dialogue requires that participants listen for meaning by suspending personal opinions. The dialogue process invites participants to grow in understanding and perhaps decide to act together with common goals.

The Story of Reframing Aging: Quick Start Guide

Download or print this colorful, new flyer that tells The Story of Reframing Aging. This handy resource provides a brief overview of why ageism harms all of us, what ageism sounds like, some suggestions for what you can do to confront the injustice of ageism, and a handy Quick Start Guide that underscores the need to choose our words wisely.

Harvard: Project Implicit—Participate in an Implicit Association Test (IAT)

Project Implicit is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and international collaborative of researchers who are interested in implicit social cognition. The mission of Project Implicit is to educate the public about bias and to provide a “virtual laboratory” for collecting data on the internet. Project Implicit scientists produce high-impact research that forms the basis of our scientific knowledge about bias and disparities. Take an online Implicit Association Test (IAT) to discover and understand underlaying stereotypes or biases that you may experience.

Turning the Tide: Empowering Voices in America’s Nursing Homes

In the heart of America’s nursing homes, where the wisdom of ages resides, a transformative movement is taking root. It’s a movement driven by care, respect, and above all, listening. The recent report by the Long Term Care Community Coalition, titled “They Make You Pay”: How Fear of Retaliation Silences Residents in America’s Nursing Homes, is not just a call to action—it’s an invitation to lead with empathy and integrity.

A New Chapter Begins

This comprehensive 141-page report, while shedding light on the fears that residents of long-term care facilities have about speaking out, is also a beacon of hope. It’s a roadmap that guides us, the administrators and caretakers, to foster environments where our residents not only feel heard but cherished.

The Heart of the Matter

One of the report’s poignant narratives involves a Resident Council meeting, where staff inadvertently disrupted the residents’ privacy. As the report states, “The residents in attendance stated that they preferred to meet without the staff present. However, staff still came in and out of their meetings without regard to the sign placed on the door. The residents stated that this was a violation of their privacy, and they had made reports to the nursing home’s staff” (Page 70).

The Power of Positive Change

For administrators of long-term care centers, this report is an inspiring challenge. It’s an opportunity to champion a culture of openness and respect. Here’s how we can be the heroes our residents need:

  1. Cultivate Trust and Openness: Let’s create spaces where residents feel safe and encouraged to express themselves, knowing they are respected and valued.
  2. Educate and Inspire Our Teams: Let’s invest in our staff with training that emphasizes empathy, active listening, and the residents’ rights to dignity and autonomy.
  3. Stand Firm for Justice: Let’s enact and uphold strict non-retaliation policies, making it clear that our residents’ voices are sacrosanct.
  4. Embrace Transparency: Let’s work hand-in-hand with regulatory bodies, showcasing our commitment to excellence and our proactive approach to continual improvement.
  5. Engage Heart-to-Heart with Residents and Families: Let’s not just meet with our residents and their families—let’s truly connect with them, inviting their insights and honoring their role in our community.

The Future is Bright

The title of the report, “They Make You Pay”, is a stark reminder of the emotional toll that fear can take. But as administrators, we have the power to rewrite this narrative. We can turn our facilities into havens of respect, trust, and love.

In the words of a wise resident, as quoted in the report: “We are not here to be silenced. We are here to be cared for”. For all of us in long-term care administration, this is our moment. It’s our time to listen, to act, and to be the change-makers our residents deserve.

This article is inspired by the report “They Make You Pay”: How Fear of Retaliation Silences Residents in America’s Nursing Homes by the Long Term Care Community Coalition. Administrators and stakeholders in long-term care are encouraged to read the full report for a comprehensive understanding of this critical issue.

Let this be our guiding star: In our hands, we hold the power to transform lives through care, compassion, and unwavering respect. Let’s rise to this noble calling.